Phil van Hest Presents

Reviews

This is a page for my "Standup" show "Phil the Void; Nature Abhors a Vacuum",  "Phil the Void; Comedy Over Quality", and a few just in from "Phil the Void; The Great Brain Robbery".  They are very good. There is some numerical/astrological validation/vindication here at Reviews! Read them, and then offer me representation.


The latest from The Grunion Gazette in Long Beach!  January 2010! First review of the new year!

One of the delights of small theatre companies is to watch how they nudge us out of what we think drama can offer us and do so in interesting, clever, and unique ways. "Phil the Void; the Great Brain Robbery," written and performed by Phil Van Hest for the Garage Theatre, is one such treat.

Van Hest’s character, Phil the Void – the name says it all – is an articulate, eloquent, and literate cross between a rabbi, a corporate tax attorney, and a professor of rhetoric who dissects that he calls The Great Brain Robbery. That he does so with such insight is interesting and illuminating enough, it’s the way he does it – vigorous, humorous, and disarming – that makes the 90 minutes seem less like a lecture and more like playing quarters with your Western Civ teacher after finals.

It’s a one-man show, though an industrial bubble machine that makes you think of The Lawrence Welk Show neatly symbolizes the spume of his rapid-fire patter: ideas float with delicate precision through the air and, literally but not figuratively, over the head of the audience. He’s dressed like a disheveled undertaker – black and white, stark, significant – that gives him an air of intelligence and authority but then, drinking a not insignificant quantity of beer, showing us the beginning of his male pattern baldness (he’s thirty), belching seemingly on command, you quickly realize he’s not distancing himself from the audience, he’s making us feel right at home.

His screed he delivers with conviction. What he derides, after all – the jellification of our brains – is a serious matter. Were his persona a mindless schlep, a pop culture yahoo, you would simply write him off as a poseur who was affecting intelligence as a bombastic shtick for laughs. Instead, with staggering intelligence, he analyzes the causes and effects of the Void and his analysis, funny, guttural at times, but always to the point, is the stuff with which he fills it.

He begins with the obvious Facebook phenomena, the substitution of virtual connections with people for those of a direct manner. He skewers not just the impersonal nature of the social networking tool but its inanity as well. Another culprit, a surprising one, is the practice of journaling, the way it steals opportunities for direct communications and instead becomes the guarded sanctuary for the things you should have said to someone in the first place.

The effects? He cleverly cites results from a study from prisoners ossifying in solitary confinement, which, when you think about it, describes the state in which Facebook and journaling leaves us. The potential long-term results are bleak.

The show skirts merrily along, regaling us with long digressions that miraculously stays on point. He fills the void of audience loo trips with audience attempts to read Mexican lesbian poetry aloud without busting out into laughter. Who would have thought that so many people would get stuck on the word “crotch?” There are plenty of laughs, tons to think about, delivered in an emphatic Dennis Miller rant. He hands out a bibliography before the show which you think is a goof – Oh God, homework – but which, after you see the show, you realize has informed his monologue and which, hopefully, will inform yours, as well.
- James Scarborough

Thanks James! and now... 

                  Behold, the Alpha & Omega of National Theatre Review Newspapers:                                                        THE                                                        INDIANA                                         BUSINESS                  JOURNAL!!!

 I somehow missed Phil Van Hest’s previous Indy Fringe appearances. And, judging from “Phil the Void — The Great Brain Robbery,” I’m a lesser person for it.
Van Hest’s latest show deals with our need for connectivity, a topic that leads him into the Internet, the economic collapse, belching and naked hang gliding. It’s akin to a biggie-sized “Daily Show” opening rant (without the snarkiness) tempered with Lily Tomlin’s “Search for Signs of Intelligent Life” sense of awe, cut with David Cross hipness, kneaded with Mort Sahl’s brains, and tempered with Lenny Bruce’s outrage.
That being said, Van Hest is an original. In a fair and reasonable world, he’d be playing the Murat. Highly recommended. (This is Phil. "The Murat" is a large theatre nearby.)
-Lou Harry, Indiana Business Journal 2009

This one is from WIBC 93.1 by Julie Ihlenfeldt, who, incidentally, is now on our Holiday Card mailing list I’ve noticed.

Phil Van Hest does not need me to review his show.  To the best of my knowledge, Van Hest has sold out or nearly sold out every show he has had thus far in this year’s IndyFringe.  Seeing Phil the Void is more an exploration into, “What is all the hype about?” more than anything else.  Van Hest is one of two acts that have been involved in all 5 years of IndyFringe; the other being Andrea Merlyn.  Oddly enough, these shows could not be more different.  The Great Brain Robbery is the only show that I know of that comes complete with a bibliography.  Van Hest is intelligent and he fills his hour extrapolating on humanity.  He comments on the virtual generation and the state of the economy.
In the program, Van Hest notes, “your experience of this year’s show may inform the process by which you enjoy it.”  This is the type of circular logic that fills Van Hest’s show.  I saw Van Hest’s show two years ago and I adored it.  Seeing Van Hest again only made me realize how much I have changed since two IndyFringes ago.
This is the only show in the Fringe that had me ranting the entire car ride home.  I found something intrinsically frustrating about the fact that Van Hest was quick to point out how no one thinks anymore and self-actualization is nearly inexistent in modern society.  As an audience member, I’m not sure if you are suppose to feel like part of his club of the few thinkers in a hopeless society or feel like he is talking down to you for the length of the show.  There are a few tired arguments within the show, including how the American education system neglects to emotionally grow it’s students and teach them how to cope with reality.  It seems to me that Van Hest forgets that there are limits to education and the structure of education does not hand you knowledge, instead providing you the tools to figure it out for yourself.  Van Hest seems to have taken those extra steps and the assumption that the majority of society is disinterested in this seems a bit short sided.
Phil the Void gives the mind plenty of fuel and concepts to chew over.  The irony of an intelligent show like this is that if you agree or disagree with Van Hest, his goal has been reached.  He has a way of connecting to the core of people and really making them think.  Sure, I was ranting the whole way home, but that only meant that Van Hest’s words had reached me.  Phil the Void – The Great Brain Robbery is a truly unique Fringe experience.  If the show sounds interesting, I highly suggest you see it for yourself and figure out your own opinions.  My only warning is, arrive early.  We were at the show prior to Van Hest’s in Comedy Sportz and by the time we got outside, there was already a long line forming for Phil the Void.  This show does include foul language and drug references.